These new twits of President Donald Trump about Barak Obama, need to be studied for hidden messages

Let’s reed the following twits of President Donald Trump… it seems like some sort of declaration of no quarter given war:

#1


#2

 

#3

 

#4


#5

And here is for the phrase “no quarters given”, this is the image of it:

 

and for the description of it, read the following:

In war, a victor gives no quarter (or takes no prisoners[1]) when the victor shows no clemency or mercy and refuses to spare the life of a vanquished opponent in return for their surrender at discretion (unconditional surrender).[2] In some circumstances, the opposing forces would signal their intention to give no quarter by using a red flag;[3][4] however, the use of a red flag to signal no quarter does not appear to have been universal among combatants.

Under the modern laws of war, “it is especially forbidden … to declare that no quarter will be given”. This was established under Article 23 (d) of the 1907 Hague Convention IV – The Laws and Customs of War on Land.[5]

Since a judgment on the law relating to war crimes and crimes against humanity at the Nuremberg Trials in October 1946, the 1907 Hague Convention, including the explicit prohibition to declare that no quarter will be given, is considered to be part of the customary laws of war and binding on all parties in an international armed conflict.[6]

Etymology

The term may originate from an order by the commander of a victorious army that they “will not quarter (house)” captured enemy combatants. Therefore, none can be taken prisoner and all enemy combatants must be killed.[7] A second derivation, given equal prominence in the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), is that quarter (n.17) can mean “Relations with, or conduct towards, another” as in Shakespeare Oth. II. iii. 180, “Friends all..In Quarter, and in termes like Bride, and Groome.” So “no quarter” may also mean to refuse to enter into an agreement (relations) with an enemy attempting to surrender. The OED mentions a third possible derivation but says “The assertion of De Brieux (1672 Origines..de plusieurs façons de parler, 16) that it arose in an agreement between the Dutch and Spaniards, by which the ransom of an officer or private was to be a quarter of his pay, is at variance with the constant sense of the phrases give and receive quarter.”

In medieval combat chivalry often demanded that armies met under a flag of truce to negotiate the time and place a battle would occur and on what ground a victor would be judged. In these the battle was often not to establish or maintain control of the ground upon which it was fought but to judge the relative (military) strengths of opposing argument. The stronger side may Offer Quarter to the weaker side, a compromise in the stronger army’s favour that if accepted would prevent the need for bloodshed to occur.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*